across an undefined thickness. Thermal resistance varies with thickness. Test Methods – ASTM D 2 in. diameter stack (ref. in2) – psi, 1 hour. In this paper we will present work-to-date on an ASTM D standard apparatus where we have tried to incorporate improvements implemented or suggested. Abstract. The ASTM D standard is currently being revised to cover a test method for the measurement of thermal impedance and calculation of an.
|Published (Last):||15 April 2006|
|PDF File Size:||10.8 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.67 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In order for the stepped-bar apparatus to achieve the same uncertainty as that of a conventional ASTM D apparatus, more temperature probes are required. Electronics Cooling Electronics Cooling astm d has been providing a technical data column since with the intent of providing you, the astm d, with pertinent material properties for use in thermal astm d This standard is especially useful for measuring thermal transmission properties of specimens that are wstm too thin or have insufficient mechanical stability to allow placement of temperature sensors in the specimen as in Test Method E Based on a numerical heat transfer analysis of the stepped-bar , the URB can be divided into two parts for curve fitting: Such improvements, however, usually come with increased equipment cost, and they do not eliminate the need for testing in-applications, so the total cost for testing can be high.
Because possible misalignments are usually neglected in uncertainty analysis, we could not find published experimental data that asttm the role misalignments have in measurement uncertainty this is done numerically in .
Towards Reproducible ASTM D Measurements at Lower Cost | Electronics Cooling
This result indicates that the stepped-bar approach can be implemented with no significant loss in measurement accuracy. The thermal resistance of aluminium foil 10 microns thick and three graphite samples from GrafTech HT, HT, and HT were also measured with the stepped bar. He is astm adtm interested in the scalable fabrication of organic and organic-inorganic hybrid nanostructures adtm novel use in technologies such as thermal interface materials, thermoelectrics and astm d cells, infrared and optical rectenna, and materials that can be tuned to regulate the flow of heat.
The error bars arise from the precision of the thermocouples and their placement. This modification allows machining errors and bar misalignments without a reduction in the contact area between the URB and the TIM.
ASTM D5470 PDF
Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the astn. The intercept at zero thickness is the sum of the contact resistances at the two surfaces. To reflect the commercial practice of measuring thickness as manufactured rather than measuring thickness in an assembly, thickness is asm from measurements made at room temperature in astm d with Method C of Test Methods D These materials exhibit no evidence of astm d behavior or the tendency to return to initial s5470 after deflection stresses are removed.
But there is a clear cost advantage, which could save resources for increased testing of TIMs in their application. The dotted red line indicates the average value of the thermal resistance measurements. Standardized testing is useful, however, for comparing TIMs in research and development. In fact, these materials are usually not homogeneous, but the assumption does not detract from the usefulness of the test methods. Further, reproducible measurements based on ASTM D remain challenging to achieve, and recent studies to improve the accuracy of d540 standard have not focused on quantifying measurement reproducibility with large sample sets.
These materials exhibit no evidence of elastic behavior or the tendency to return to initial shape after deflection stresses are removed.
The operator only has to align the TIM to the lower reference bar LRB — a two surface alignment — rather than aligning the sample to both reference bars — a four surface alignment. To reflect the commercial practice satm measuring thickness as manufactured rather than measuring thickness in an ast, thickness is determined from measurements made at room temperature in accordance with Method C of Test Methods D The inverse of the slope of the resulting straight d5740 is the apparent thermal conductivity.
Additional details of this design are reported elsewhere . These materials exhibit linear elastic properties with significant deflection relative to material thickness. Because instabilities of the threaded rod introduce imprecision in aligning the URB with the LRB, the oversized URB ensures that these misalignments do not reduce the contact area of the sample and introduce errors into asym thermal resistance measurements.
But our colleagues in industry and academia tell us that their data scatter for a large set of the same type d sample is often much larger than what astm d measurement uncertainty analysis predicts, even when 5d470 reasonable variations in the properties of the samples.
The inverse of the slope of the resulting straight line is the apparent thermal conductivity. The temperature profile remains linear in the Sstm for both approaches. This obviates the need for expensive bar alignment and loading mechanisms, which can often be the largest component costs in the system.
Misalignments reduce the effective contact area between the sample and the reference bars as shown in Figure 1a. But our colleagues in industry and academia tell us that their data scatter for a large set of the same type of sample is often much larger than what their measurement uncertainty analysis predicts, even when considering reasonable variations in the properties of the samples.
The heat rate and interface temperatures are calculated from temperature measurements in the reference asm in contact with the TIM.
This method is now deleted because of a lack of general support. He received his B. But there is a clear cost advantage, which could save resources for increased testing of TIMs in their application. A round robin of tests in different labs, and with several different TIMs, is ultimately required to conclude the superior reproducibility of stepped-bar ASTM D approach.
The holes in a and b represent the suggested thermocouple placement for accurate scale and additional details on thermocouple placement see . The need for improved measurement reproducibility e. To avoid confusion, this test method uses “apparent thermal conductivity” for measurements of both homogeneous and non-homogeneous materials.
We have largely covered the most common materials and their associated thermal properties used in electronics packaging. Likewise, the manufacturer-specified thermal resistance value of This figure is reproduced from  with permission from ASME. This is accomplished by measuring the aetm impedance of different thicknesses of the material under test and plotting thermal impedance versus thickness.
These include liquid compounds such as greases, pastes, and phase change materials.
This figure is reproduced from  with permission from ASME. The dotted red line indicates the average value of the thermal resistance astm d Each additional temperature probe increases the cost of the apparatus. Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard. In the design shown in Figure 2, the URB has a square cross-sectional area measuring 1.
A round robin of tests in different labs, and with several different TIMs, is ultimately required to conclude the superior reproducibility of astmm ASTM Asfm approach.
Figure 5 shows the frequency histogram for all measurements of the TC gap pad using the stepped-bar ASTM D with stainless-steel reference bars. This article highlights the importance of accounting for reference zstm alignment for reproducible TIM measurements. The major drawback of the stepped-bar approach is that heat flow is constricted from the URB to the TIM, resulting in a nonlinear temperature profile in the URB, so a simple one-dimensional heat conduction model cannot be used to determine the upper interface temperature.
The thermal resistance versus applied pressure for these samples is shown in Figure 4.